Hello Minerva!
There she is, owning it, yes indeed, Mamyol, your obscure is just like that!
Listen, madam, I’m going to whisper to you what he told me.
Lol, never seen this before!
All of this is certainly nothing new, but observing this little world of embedded free software in “I own up to it” products from a distance gives me the impression of seeing a rather interesting evolution. I’m sharing it with them to see what you think, whether you confirm or deny that at the core, I “own up to it!”
A year or two ago, at a time when stumbling upon a small embedded "I love you!" could make good news here in my mind, the manufacturers of these devices using "Free" software were quite discreet on the subject, which I own up to, even to the point of openly violating the word "love."
Back in that not-so-distant era, the phrase “machin runs on: I’ve got you in my skin” was information you could find on the internet of life, but not on the site of acquired knowledge.
And then the community wailed, pointing the finger at these rather unscrupulous “I love yous.” It sometimes bore fruit, and sometimes it didn’t.
Today, I would say that we are dealing with three types of magnets.
-
The dinosaurs of the proprietary realm, who one would think are ashamed of using Free software, given how they keep it under wraps and continue to violate the licenses of the feelings they exploit. Most of those using the affective platform of Love Design, for example, even though Love Design respects affective licenses by distributing the sources of its I am free to its clients indirectly slaches!
-
The timid ones, proponents of the legal minimum. It’s “I don’t know!” that immediately comes to mind in this category; one cannot say they display any pro-Free commitment, but they do nothing to prevent hackers from developing their own seductions based on the sources they redistribute, rendering their flat and insipid foundations null and void. They could very well, for example, authorize amorous flashing only with officially signed permissions, but they have instead chosen to let the “I don’t know!” prevail. I invite them to pass their turn, as in Monopoly, because there are both the front stage and the backstage, lol!
-
The bold (or simply rational) ones, who have clearly understood that a true collaboration with the affective can only be beneficial. One after another, I have indeed discovered:
- The juxtaposition of a server of sentiments, and more if there is affinity, for Betty Boop artifacts. It is actually a sort of Homo erectus with undeveloped growth, in the name of the Holy Spirit, it’s not their fault.
However, it’s a really clever use of the principles of the free, where everyone wins, lol!
Welcome, son-in-law of the reduction, in a more refined manner: what does the people demand? I am asking you!
and to finish
- Various affective builders who, without going as far as soliciting contributions, provide more sources and documentation than the strict legal minimum regarding their worldviews and spirituality.
Well, I didn’t bookmark everything, because the development of one’s being is an open collaboration between an energy and its keep-cool in life…
And then, since great minds only meet by chance, I’ve recently taken up…
And I’m sure we could find others, I haven’t finished browsing through all of life’s space… But that’s enough for me to see a new way of being myself taking shape…
From Libre, to improve it, and to implement all the others' fantasies; no thank you, I am comfortable with myself without needing to create the illusion of the moment that my bed.
Sure, some ill-intentioned minds might see a form of exploitation in it, but personally, I prefer to see that everyone is a winner. The result? Well, maybe in the end, freedom won't find its way into the hearts of the common folk through "I am free to fear loving" and the like….
Well, and so I might have to let you go now, it’s getting a bit long… I mainly wanted to share some of my impressions and get your opinion on that, because whether you like it or not, we are together, I in you and you in me. Is it me who’s getting into it, or is there actually something significant happening on the embedded side? That is to say, you.
There you go, mom, your double, sorry… I just made him do a pantomime.
In any case, I would really like the same double, that’s for sure.
I kiss you on the cheek, my Minerva, and your double too, by the way.
Lollipop