Past life & dream

Hello,

A friend recently told me about a dream he had when he was 3 years old… (yes, even at 3 years old)…

It was in a hut built using wattle-and-daub techniques, and around the house there were "fences" also made using wattle-and-daub techniques, all in wood.

He must have dreamed of a past life, he says.

This experience is on my mind…

This friend is Bulgarian, and I find myself thinking that this technique dates back to prehistoric times.

I am asking a colleague and friend at the university.

He was the one who told me that this wickerwork technique existed in our region, meaning in Switzerland, France, Germany, and Austria at the time, but that in the Balkans and in Turkey there were other techniques, although there were indeed prehistoric sites.

The gears in my brain are starting to turn… and I tell myself that on the one hand, this friend couldn’t have known that at age three… and on the other hand, he must not have always lived in the Balkans…

Do you have similar experiences to share with us?

ClaudiaC

It’s strange, Claudiac, because what you’re telling me reminded me of a day when I was about three years old. I was playing in the garden and my mother called me to come inside, and when she said my name, I clearly remember sitting on the steps of the staircase leading to the house in the garden and wondering why she was calling me that way… So I said out loud that my name wasn’t that, but Carolinn, that she was mistaken, and that I was someone else, and my mother burst out laughing.

How can I do channeling? Can I do it on my own?

Friendship
Natou

Natou,
Perhaps your mother burst out laughing, but I think a three-year-old doesn’t make things up… how could you have known that first name?
The regression book I used for regression begins as follows:

One day my daughter says to me: “I would never have allowed you that!” (German text) saying: I would never have allowed you that.

So the mother realized that her daughter was using a language she did not know in her daily life, and that her own daughter had been her mother in another life…

As for channeling, I haven’t heard of anyone being able to do it alone. Perhaps someone else could inform us?

ClaudiaC

Hello … for channeling, you must have both the feminine and masculine polarities, in the sense that you cannot do it alone. It is recommended to do channeling with another person first, as it requires a great deal of intellectual rigor, and you cannot simultaneously be the reception of the message, analyze it, and ask questions at the same time. Channeling is a team effort involving both polarities (male/female or female/male … feminine/masculine or masculine/feminine), requiring a receiver and a transmitter, as well as great intellectual rigor. and of practice, practice, practice.

Rolande

Hello Rolande
Have you ever practiced it? How does it work in practice?

ClaudiaC

Hello Claudiac, yes, I practiced for a while, and it requires a great deal of self-confidence and a complete letting go of the mind.

On the practical side, great relaxation and a guide who is keen to share positive messages. I have attended a lot of channeling in my life and have seen excellent ones, average ones, mediocre ones, and even worse ones. It all comes down to receptivity... a complete letting go.

The person who accompanies the other in receptivity needs to be well grounded in the material. We don’t do channeling just because we want to or because we improvise as a channel; I think the channel is chosen with the same affinities as the guide or the light being that presents itself.

A word to those with a very low vibrational rate: you will only communicate with so-called mischievous entities, etc. That is why you need to work in pairs. It is necessary to dissect the messages to determine who this guide is, where they come from, their name, etc., and the person receiving the communication must have an accompanist to verify what is present in the communication. You will also have to work on your vibrational rate, and during the transmission, the light beings work on your vibrational rate. It is possible that just before the communication you feel tingling, a kind of dizziness at the crown, an increase in heart rate, etc., which the light beings stabilize, as they know the effect on your body. A light being will never leave you in physical suffering, and you must know how to distinguish them well. After the communication, it is a rest for your brain and your body. A person very accustomed to channeling can transmit for an hour, and the light beings say so when the channel is tired in their body because of the vibrational rate.

You should start slowly, and it is recommended to record the sessions the first few times so you can listen back to what happened in order to structure the communications.

A small hiccup: If you are only channeling words of noise, pain, or death, something is happening that is not healthy for the channel, so it is best to refrain and engage in purification (introspection) and to attract the vibration rate that is equal to your own. This gives an indication of your evolution on the vibratory level. To be a channel, one needs to lead a good life free from psychological worries, etc. It is the same for a psychic. If they only see death, etc., they should recenter and engage in introspection about what they see in clairvoyance, etc. The same applies to those who feel the misfortune of others. When one only sees the misfortune of others, whether in channeling or in a tarot reading, and never sees the light of people, it would be best to refrain and look at one's own life and how it is being led. I think we need to learn to see the beautiful lights of people and the positive strengths of the people to whom we give life readings. Humans are fundamentally wonderful and good. It is their little quirks that create obstacles to opening up, and somewhere, it is about seeing beyond their inner quirks.

Channeling is not a game. It requires, once again, rigor and not being deceived by what we channel. You may have noticed that I speak a lot about intellectual rigor, as it is essential to know how to distinguish, dissect, and analyze the communications received. In the early days, any novice is often impressed by the message received or by what they see. That is where rigor is required and where it is important to have a good guide who has a lot of discernment. The channel must also be able to express in concrete terms what is being communicated and not to distort the messages received. Because EDL goes through your intellect, and what is said by EDL enters your brain, from which you make the reading and you restate the message from your own intellect. And in our brain, many of our beliefs, etc., are located, and it is all of this that must be dissected, which requires rigor to make the difference between the message received and the intellect of the one who receives it.

Rolande

All of this is once again very interesting, Rolande. Does it also depend on who performs the channeling?

I am not taking this as a game at all, so don't worry. It's just a better understanding of myself. I think I can still learn a lot about myself. And others about themselves.

So, a certain receptivity is required?

It’s the same for a psychic… if they only see death, etc., they should recenter themselves and engage in introspection about what they see through clairvoyance, etc.… the same goes for someone who feels the misfortune of others, etc. When one only sees the misfortune of others, whether through channeling or a tarot reading, and never sees the light of people, it would be preferable to refrain and look at one’s own life and how it is being lived. I think we need to learn to see the beautiful lights of people and the positive strengths of the people to whom we give life readings, etc.… human beings are fundamentally wonderful and good…

With this, do you mean that a psychic must first see the light in their own life and have great confidence in their life, before immersing themselves in the lives of others?
If this person is rather “dark,” can they see “black” or can they completely detach?
I think the best thing is to let go and remain neutral, right? For everyone’s sake?

ClaudiaC

With this, do you mean that a psychic must first see the light in their own life and have great confidence in their life, before immersing themselves in the lives of others?

If this person is rather “Black,” can they see “black” or can they completely detach themselves?
I think the best thing is to let go and remain neutral, right? For everyone's sake?

Yes, Claudiac, a psychic must have light in their life and have confidence in themselves and in life. A good psychic does not meddle in people’s lives; quite the opposite, they respect the other person’s territory, because a good psychic knows the rules of the universe and understands that if they meddle in people’s lives without permission, they will pay the price; such is the universal law, Claudiac. I think that by neutrality, I understand detachment from results and detachment from emotions. I would like you to explain to me what you mean by neutrality.

A concrete example I can give you is Josy’s writings: when she intervenes, when I read them, there is a lot of discernment, love, and no personal judgment of the person. All the information she provides is serene, good, and honest. She sees into people’s hearts and also offers suggestions at the same time. This is good communication and a good intuition on her part (know-how, being, and saying). Even if she feels people’s emotions, she sees beyond appearances or what is written here, which demonstrates respect for the other’s space, etc. This requires skill and presence… Sometimes one can see people’s inner wounds, but the tricky part is knowing what is good to say and not say, and how to say it. What emanates from her is the source, a connection with love. I sincerely believe that Josy is a very good medium (by the way, medium means INTERMEDIARY) in her way of being and her letting go.

I sincerely believe, Claudiac, that a psychic and so on has a code of ethics, a way of proceeding, what they want to do and what they do not want to do; a psychic must also make assessments in their life, etc., choose and be chosen, just like the normal life of EHs. I believe that being a psychic is ultimately also a way of life. What we tell others is because we apply it in our own lives and because we are integrated, especially toward ourselves.

When all you see in clairvoyance is darkness, something is wrong, and it is suggested to step back. The person may be tired, or going through stressful times, etc. One must be able to observe and question oneself—something you do wonderfully well, Claudiac. I appreciate this strength in you, Claudiac.

Rolande

:o

I think that by neutrality, I understand DETACHMENT from outcomes and detachment from emotions. I would like you to explain to me what you mean by neutrality.

By neutral, yes, detachment is a good word. But also to say what is true.

My concrete example:
The last time I went to a psychic in town, I wasn't convinced before I went, and I still wasn't convinced after I came out.
Convinced by what she taught me. Nothing very concrete. And nothing new.
She would tell me one thing, and then she would share her own experience… through hints, I understood that she was advising me to do as she had, without saying it directly to me.

To practice clairvoyance, one must on the one hand have a very good knowledge of the tarot, but on the other hand have a very good intuition, that is, mediumship.
If I see that the person is not better off than before, I ask myself… did it help or not?

Do you understand me?

ClaudiaC

Yes, Claudiac, you need to know both the theory and the practice. Your example is good. I understand you, Claudiac. And to know how to transcend the intellect—once, an old woman told me that Roland accepts that your intellect be spiritualized. I had laughed a lot, because she was right.

Rolande

She would tell me one thing, and then she would share her own experience… through innuendo, I understood that she was advising me to do as she had, without saying it directly to me.

This way of doing things is not clairvoyance, it is a projection…
Rolande

Thank you, Rolande, I would actually not like to engage in projection...

But to correctly interpret a reading with the right intuition in order to help or guide in the direction the other person wants, and not in the opposite direction… or else say nothing… if you’re not sure of yourself…

However, I understand the cards I draw for myself best—once properly interpreted, of course… Are we all like that?

ClaudiaC

But to correctly interpret a reading with the right intuition in order to help or guide in the direction the other person wants, and not in the opposite direction… or else say nothing… if you’re not sure of yourself…

You mean without theory, Claudiac, yes, that is quite likely, probably on a natural psychic or on clairvoyance, but it still needs to be verified with the person being consulted.

However, I understand the cards I draw for myself best—once interpreted, of course… Are we all like that?

It would be very limited of me to say that we are all the same, as each degree of consciousness in human beings is different, and it is in our difference that we are yet similar. There is a person who once said that order creates disorder and disorder creates order (the principle of homeostasis).

Rolande

No theory… yes, tell me… what about the crystal ball? Can you see anything in it? Or is it pure clairvoyance?

With theory, yes, but with feeling as well

I have never tried the Claudiac crystal ball, maybe someone else can inform you about it... sorry

Rolande

Claudiac, you're giving me the urge to start an online tarot school lol lol

I just know you would be successful… and get really rich, Rolande.

ClaudiaC

P.S. I was told recently that I’m curious…

hahaha lol